Out-of-Classroom Pedagogical Support
 
Library Research Guide
 
Peer Teacher
 
 
Writing Consultant
 
Rewarding Resource Use
 
Library Research Guide

On the first day of class, college reference librarians and I introduce students to a web-based bibliographic research guide, since bibliographical research is required for all five projects. This practical comprehensive resource helps students throughout the semester with their search for and acquisition of articles and books. It also provides links to useful scientific databases, information for citing online or print journals and web-based information and tips for various types of science writing and oral presentation. 
Library Resource Page

Peer Teacher
I actively employ peer-based supplemental instruction, a well-established teaching and learning support system used in many undergraduate institutions. In spring 2002, I selected two peer teachers (who were academically superior students familiar with my pedagogy). These two paid students  underwent formal on-the-job training in peer instruction at Lake Forest College's Learning and Teaching Center. They attended all lectures and weekly lab sections and held optional weekly supplemental instruction sessions with my students, which I did not attend. These peer-guided self-help sessions were designed to reinforce key concepts taught in lecture and lab.  Peer teachers also played active instructional roles in laboratory, where I provided them direct opportunities for instruction. Most relevant to the five projects, peer teachers held two research communication skills workshops targeted to further educate students on how to master the projects. They described in detail the specific requirements of each project (reinforcing information that I initially provided via the syllabus workshop and written syllabus). They also showed and discussed past examples of good and excellent papers and PowerPoint presentations from past students and provided lists of Do's and Don'ts for each project. Project grading sheets were reviewed to give students insight into what I most look for in their final products. I did not attend these workshops because I believe that my absence allowed peer teachers to more confidently and freely teach the ropes of success.
Svetla Stamenova '02, a Biology major and is currently a research technician with Dr. Linda Hicke in the Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry at Northwestern University  (Evanston, IL) and is considering graduate school in the near future.
Learning and Teaching Center

On Training Peer Teachers

 
Angela Eakley'03, a native of Mequon (Wisconsin), is a Biology
and Art senior at Lake Forest College and is considering graduate
school in the near future.
 Writing Consultant
I also employed a student to serve as a paid writing consultant in this course. Three of the five projects (Projects 2, 3 and 5) require submitting papers, each a distinct form of science writing.  To help students meet the strong writing emphasis, I identified an academically outstanding senior biology senior with superior writing skills to be a tutor at the collegeâs Writing Center. I encouraged students to have drafts of all three papers reviewed by this consultant. For students who need most help with writing, I encouraged additional visits. In spring 2002, all seven  student groups met with the writing consultant for the two group-based writing projects (Projects 3 and 5); seventeen student used the writing consultant for the individual assignment (Project 2).
 
 
                Writing Center 

On Training Writing Consultants

Jen McGuire'02, a native of San Francisco (CA), graduated
as a biology and french double major and is currently a res
earch associate with Dr. Karen Kirk in Lake Forest College's
Biology Department and is considering graduate school in
the near future.
Rewarding Resource Use & Collaborative Preparation 

I instituted Resource Use and Collaboration Points into the grading scheme of the course, so that students receive credit for utilizing the several resources put in place, since I consider the process students take in developing each project an important aspect of building their process skills. Students earn these points by 

1) attending the two peer communication skills workshops
2) getting drafts of the three written assignments for Projects 2, 3, and 5 critiqued by the writing consultant
3) attending mandatory group meetings with the instructor to discuss research progress
4) meeting project bibliography deadlines
5) practicing their two talks for Projects 2 and 4 in front of peers

 

return