|
An
example of student paper is not shown because these lab projects
are repeated frequently from year to year. So, showing an example
on a public domain will not allow students of future classes to author
their own articles independently without being influenced by papers of
previous years.
Finally,
after becoming very familiar with grasping and communicating about primary
articles, students get to write their own primary article. As explained
earlier, in the laboratory and before midterms students worked in pairs
to complete a multi-week investigative lab. The student pairs now co-author
a formal manuscript designed to mimic a primary research article to be
submitted to a real peer-reviewed journal (for formatting purposes, I usually
choose Cell). In addition to discussing primary articles already
published (in Cell) as examples, peer teachers and I provide detailed instructions
on content and format. Before student pairs submit their completed manuscript,
I encourage them to writing consultant. When completed manuscripts are
initially submitted, peer teachers and the writing consultant grade them
and provide comments with particularly strict rigor. As such, initial grades
are usually quite low and allow for significant improvements for the final
draft. Students are given at least three additional weeks to make
all revisions (typically the paper is due the last week of the semester).
The incentive for revised final submission is purposely substantial: up
to 30 points (three letter grades) can be made up on this project based
on the quality of revised efforts. The writing consultant and peer teachers
recommend the final grade, for which I reserve final responsibility. |